Youth Education

This article highlights the “We the People Foundation” for their continued efforts to restore American rights and hold government accountable federal limits set by the Constitution. I want to recognize their efforts with the Clean Elections Study, the people’s right to petition the court, and for their tireless efforts on various tax issues. The Foundation is a foundation of research and teaching in the protection and defense of the “individual rights by the Constitutions of the United States and the fifty states of the Union focuses guaranteed.” They also act as a watchdog activists by his sister, the organization “We the People’s Congress.”

Without doubt one of the most important legal issues the Supreme Court is on the right of the people on the government for redress of a complaint by Robert Schulz and the We the People Foundation filed petition rule. “In 2001, the Foundation and other advocates of truth-in-government of Robert Schulz, an appointment with the government officials who questions the American people about our government action to answer and would lead his” laws. The government’s response was not the answer to the questions they said they would respond by the application.

Mr. Schulz and the Foundation then sued the government under the First Amendment right to the government for a redress of complaints, petitions, and they chose to withhold the funding until the courts decided the case. The government’s response has been proposed that the people the right to petition have, but the government is not required to respond. The case was then brought to the Supreme Court appeal. The courts are still deciding whether or not to hear the case.

The importance of this case is to decide not only whether the government should respond to the petition of the people, but especially when the government is responsible for the people. If the government is no longer necessary to the injustice he has committed against the people, then our last vestige of a peaceful solution to declare is lost.

The second area of interest is the National Election Study’s (nThis). With all the negative pressure on the Diebold voting machines, one might think that the government not the machines, but this happens.

A “We the People Foundation” Flyer raises the following questions:
“The continuation of the Federal Government, which follows so-called nThis, National Clean Elections complaint, documented failure of the official voting machines the state survey in 2007 Iowa Straw, the continuing claims and statistical studies called into question the integrity of the presidential elections of 2004 and the official certification of this final August, almost all major electronic voting system by the Secretary of State of California. Many who complete academic studies have shown the vulnerability of systems “material, including software criminal manipulation, network hacking and fraud.” On the basis of the documented problems with these systems and the need for safe, honest and verifiable voting laid the foundation of the nThis.

Finally, get, Robert Schulz and the We the People Foundation “for years in an effort of the government to answer questions about mistreatment by the IRS against his” people and tax work. It is perfect for the constitutional government to tax, but has no general power and unlimited.

Schulz, reported on its website, the purpose of foundations:

“Our ultimate goal is to detect, correct and confront the governments that prevent outside their letter, the legal authority and the institutionalization of a national civil vigilance to future abuses, and the maintenance of liberty for our posterity.”

The Supreme Court has decided that the original petition for a writ of certiorari in the case of the right mouse button on the petition of the story: “We deny the people against the United States.” It was a trap on the First Amendment right of citizens to the government for a redress of complaints petition is based. The government said that the people have the right to petition have, but the government has no obligation to respond to the petition. The complaint was an attempt to make the Supreme Court on this issue as a constitutional question, affirming the right of the people government to rule over the people. Sure, the Supreme Court does not care about the respect the Constitution as such cases were never heard before. So why, in my opinion, they refuse to hear the case?

First, if the page of “We the People Foundation,” then the government is obliged to answer some 200 questions + that the government is wrong on a number of questions and showed terminate the current tax system.

Second, if they have found in favor of the government, they are over-the decision of the Constitution, in fact, the killing of the Constitution.

And thirdly, to do nothing, they maintain the status quo at the expense of the rights, property and freedoms of persons and other citizens of the country, above all, they can not blame “as it is not the case.

So, in essence, have a pack of loose black robes who stay longer care for their positions in fear of the Constitution, the status quo in the Constitution. I believe that they have broken their oath to preserve and defend the Constitution and their actions or omissions in this case is crucial for treason.